tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5316312.post114960066842835546..comments2024-03-27T02:08:08.415-04:00Comments on Representative Press Blog: Prof Jones and his 9/11 PaperTomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07286381479904247541noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5316312.post-62391781392354111482008-12-30T04:33:00.000-05:002008-12-30T04:33:00.000-05:00Second Anonymous poster down: "Physics of Jet fuel...Second Anonymous poster down: "Physics of Jet fuel". That has got to be the most misused phrase I have ever heard. You really like to let people think you're smart because you use the word "physics" and attach it to everything, don't you? <BR/><BR/>How about the physics of this next statement: You're a tool. What is the mathematical equation for an idiot on the internet? (Here's a hint: You + Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5316312.post-54314983102335644042008-06-18T10:17:00.000-04:002008-06-18T10:17:00.000-04:00How the CIA trains terrorists and uses them as pre...How the CIA trains terrorists and uses them as pretexts<BR/><BR/>What is the USA doing in IRAQ?<BR/>The most important thing that is happening in Iraq is that America takes Iraq's oil reserves. Bin Laden - the executor for plans of the CIA - provided necessary pretexts for the USA to attack and put the plans in practice. Also at present Bin Laden - coordinated to the plans of the CIA - bomb Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5316312.post-8464418744081968062008-03-11T10:27:00.000-04:002008-03-11T10:27:00.000-04:00Jones has certainly made mistakes.But I'm convince...Jones has certainly made mistakes.<BR/><BR/>But I'm convinced that he's onto something regarding the temperature discrepancies he has noted. (See his latest paper, <A HREF="http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf" REL="nofollow">Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction </A> (PDF), especially section 4, "Discussion of relevant previously publishedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5316312.post-42114849601362100512007-06-17T15:36:00.000-04:002007-06-17T15:36:00.000-04:00"around the points of impact"NO, You don't know wh..."around the points of impact"<BR/><BR/>NO, You don't know what you are talkign about. The bowing is not around the impact, it is on opposite sides of the building. (I told you this already in the commnets to my video) <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7EB1FxENxQ" REL="nofollow">"Sit Down!" The Power to Silence</A>Tomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07286381479904247541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5316312.post-62590708092458399882007-06-17T10:43:00.000-04:002007-06-17T10:43:00.000-04:00"BUT NIST DOESN'T SAY core columns pulled the exte..."BUT NIST DOESN'T SAY core columns pulled the exterior columns!" - RepresentativePress<BR/><BR/>The photos only show bowing around the points of impact can you tell me how else the columns would bow if the floor was not creating leverage on them? Also can you explain to my how all the OTHER columns that were not bowing were not able to hold up the weight, given the structure was intended to Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5316312.post-42714278707468738822007-06-17T00:00:00.000-04:002007-06-17T00:00:00.000-04:00If the floors did sag and fall, there still should...If the floors did sag and fall, there still should have been the center columns intact. <BR/><BR/>There should have also been WHOLE center beams and colums, not and ZERO melted steel. ZERO aerosol. ZERO pyrite.<BR/><BR/>Also what about claims of seismic activity partial seconds before the building began to fall? One might expect siesmic activity AFTER the fall (there was none), but what aboutAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com