I posted the following comment in response to John Amato's post The other Jimmy Carter C-SPAN call (satire):
"Seems like the comedy writer's attempt to discredit Carter for daring to write a book critical of the Israeli government's actions. The media were eager to spread Kenneth W. Stein's charges BUT if you look, he doesn't give any examples that have anything to do with his allegation that the book is "one sided."
The ironic thing is Carter's book has Zionist propaganda in it which serves the Israel agenda, for example on page 57. See how misrepresentative this is and how it omits key facts so that it ends up painting a picture as if the "Jewish community" was being reasonable and that they were "attacked." But the fact is, the 1947 UN plan was a proposal and it was the democratic right of 67% of the population to turn down such an unfair and crazy proposal.
This is a critical fact often omitted and this leads to a very distorted view of what happened in 1948. The misleading story often told is that "Jews declared Israel and then they were attacked." The fact is from November 1947 to May 1948 the Zionists were already on the offensive and had already attacked Arabs. In the months before Israel was declared, the Zionists had driven 300,000 non-Jews off their land. In the months before Israel was declared, the Zionists had seized land beyond the proposed Jewish State.
In practice, Zionists did not accept the UN Partition Plan. Zionists seized areas beyond the proposed Jewish State and did not recognize the International Zone. Using force and terrorism months before May 1948, Jews seized land beyond the UN proposed borders. The UN Plan was used as a pretense for taking over most of Palestine."
Then I see my post was removed and this was in its place:
"[Deleted. Take the bigotry elsewhere] Edited By Siteowner"
I then posted this response:
"Take the bigotry elsewhere"
Take down that comment connected with my name or you will hear from my lawyer. There was not a damn thing "bigoted" in my post and it is libelous for you to claim was. You can not label the listing of historical facts as "bigotry" just because you don't like them.
You need to explain what in God's name you think is "bigotry" in my post.
Are you ignorant of the definition of the word Zionist? Are you ignorant of the fact that from November 1947 to May 1948 the Zionists were already on the offensive and had already attacked Arabs. In the months before Israel was declared, the Zionists had driven 300,000 non-Jews off their land. In the months before Israel was declared, the Zionists had seized land beyond the proposed Jewish State.
What you need to do is stop libeling people immediately.
Another Zionist smoke screening tactic of smearing someone as an anti-Semite... Former Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky described how he used such tactics while in the Mossad (access the video short youtube URLs via the following link:
ReplyDeleteFormer Mossad operative and author of 'By Way of Deception describes how the 'anti-Semite' smoke screen is used by Zionists
US Support of Israel's brutal oppression of the Palestinians PRIMARY MOTIVATION for the tragic attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993 and on 9/11
ReplyDeleteThe word 'one sided' in the jewish view has a quite different meaning than in the western view.
ReplyDeleteIn western eyes 'one sided' means not being objective.
In jewish eyes these same words means jews are getting blame; in the jewish view even if jews are to be blamed they should not be blamed.
Holocaust survivor Israel Shahak, ‘Jewish History, Jewish Religion, The Weight of Three Thousand Years’, 1994, 2002, London, explains quite well how even today secular jews take the idea of Chosen People literally.
Therefore, who blames Chosen People is one sided.