Killing Obama for Israel is Option 3 says Atlanta Jewish Times publisher

Assassinating President Obama is an option "on the table" according to Atlanta Jewish Times owner & publisher Andrew Adler. It's "option 3" which he says we should think about:

Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States' policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.

Yes, you read "three" correctly. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel's existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don't you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel's most inner circles?

Another way of putting "three" in perspective goes something like this: How far would you go to save a nation comprised of seven million lives ... Jews, Christians and Arabs alike?

You have got to believe, like I do, that all options are on the table.

Newspaper Editor: Israel Should Consider Assassinating Obama

Uproar after Jewish American newspaper publisher suggests Israel assassinate Barack Obama

https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/284979/ajt.pdf

Notice the lack of outrage when "options on the table" include war crimes like bombing another country. Did you notice that the pundits don't express outrage about the other "options" which are not limited to the murder of a single public official but could potentially kill millions?

Abraham H. Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation League, said there is “no excuse” for that kind of rhetoric. “It doesn’t even belong in fiction. These are irresponsible and extremist words. It is outrageous and beyond the pale. An apology cannot possibly repair the damage,” he said in a statement. “Mr. Adler’s lack of judgment as a publisher, editor and columnist raises serious questions as to whether he’s fit to run a newspaper.”

What about acting like the other 2 things are "options?" Isn't arguing for committing war crimes also irresponsible, extremist words which are outrageous and beyond the pale? The other attacks which Adler claims are options are in fact crimes too.

‪NYT Caught Lying‬

‪NYT Caught Lying about Iran & IAEA Report on Civilian Nuclear Program‬

☞ PASS IT ON: http://tinyurl.com/NYTcaught

War Propaganda Exposed: Three Part Video

Three Part Video

1. War Propaganda Exposed Part 1 Mass Media Warmongering Against Iran
2. War Propaganda Exposed Part 2 Confronting Lies About Iran & Israel
3. Bachmann Called Out on Her Lies (Part 3 of War Propaganda Exposed)

The truth of the matter

The well respected author Noam Chomsky has written about Israel's intentional attack on the USS Liberty:

“The truth of the matter is that Israel has been granted a unique immunity from criticism in mainstream journalism and scholarship … the attack on the unmistakably identified U.S. Liberty with rockets, aircraft cannon, napalm, torpedoes and machine guns, clearly premeditated, leaving 34 crewmen dead and 75 wounded in “the Navy’s bloodiest ‘peacetime’ international incident of the 20th century" … the general reaction of the press and scholarship has been silence or misrepresentation. … The nature of the attack on the Liberty was also evaded not only by the press fairly generally but by the government and by a U.S. Naval Board of Inquiry, though high-ranking figures had no doubt that the official report was a whitewash; former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, for example, states that the attack “could not possibly have been a case of mistaken identity,” as officially claimed.” pp31-32 The Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel and the Palestinians

Openly calling for his country to violate international law

"And let's be crystal clear about what Kroenig is advocating here. He is openly calling for preventive war against Iran, even though the United States has no authorization from the U.N. Security Council, it is not clear that Iran is actively developing nuclear weapons, and Iran has not attacked us or any of our allies -- ever. He is therefore openly calling for his country to violate international law.He is calmly advocating a course of action that will inevitably kill a significant number of people, including civilians, some of whom probably despise the clerical regime (and with good reason). And Kroenig is willing to have their deaths on his conscience on the basis of a series of unsupported assertions, almost all of them subject to serious doubt." The worst case for war with Iran Posted By Stephen M. Walt Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Derail the War Train

NEW VIDEO: We've NO INDICATION Iran has decided to develop nuclear weapons

PASS IT ON ☛ http://tinyurl.com/DerailWarTrain

We have no indication that the Iranians have made a decision to develop a nuclear weapon

“George Little, the Pentagon press secretary, said Mr. Panetta’s comments should not be taken as a prediction that Iran would have a nuclear weapon within a year.

“The secretary was clear that we have no indication that the Iranians have made a decision to develop a nuclear weapon,” Mr. Little said. “He was asked to comment on prospective and aggressive timelines on Iran’s possible production of nuclear weapons — and he said if, and only if, they made such a decision. He didn’t say that Iran would, in fact, have a nuclear weapon in 2012.”

Mr. Little said inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency remained in Iran and had “good access to Iran’s continuing production of low-enriched uranium.”Should Iran choose to “break out” — diverting low-enriched uranium to produce weapons-grade highly enriched uranium — the inspectors could detect it, Mr. Little said.

“We would retain sufficient time under any such scenario to take appropriate action,” he said.” - Aides Qualify Panetta’s Comments on Iran By THOM SHANKER Published: December 20, 2011

These people need to be reminded that “appropriate action” means ONLY legal actions and that those engaged in war crimes will be held accountable.

We have no indication that the Iranians have made a decision to develop a nuclear weapon

These people need to be reminded that “appropriate action” means ONLY legal actions and that those engaged in war crimes will be held accountable.
we-have-no-indication-that-iranians.html

Iraq War Lie

http://tinyurl.com/IraqWarLie
Romney & Wallace Push Iraq War Lie on the Public
Saddam let inspectors in BUT Romney continues to lie. AND he expects to be elected president!
☃Representative Press Store ❄
☺Representative Press Paypal account
★JOIN e-Mail list: ‪http://TinyUrl.com/JoinEmail‬
See 2 Part video about UN inspectors
Pass it On ☞ http://www.Tinyurl.com/NotJustIsrael
Pass it On ☞ http://www.Tinyurl.com/IraqWarLie
Actually, at the time we already knew the intelligence was incorrect because inspectors were checking out the claims made by U.S. intelligence -- BEFORE President Bush started the Iraq war -- and none of the intel turned out to be accurate. Romney has told this lie before. The truth is Saddam WAS letting the inspectors from the United Nations into the various places that they wanted to go. And the IAEA was NOT blocked from going into the palaces.

"Romney's suggestion that weapons inspectors were not permitted into Iraq before the war started is, of course, incorrect. Weapons inspectors from UNMOVIC (the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission) returned to Iraq on November 18, 2002. Led by Hans Blix, the inspectors spent months in Iraq, issuing reports on Iraqi compliance that were a crucial part of the debate over whether to invade Iraq."
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3112

Romney repeated the false claim that Hussein never allowed inspectors in, adding that "the IAEA was blocked from going into the palaces." However, in a March 2003 Wall Street Journal op-ed, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog wrote: "In the past three months they have conducted over 200 inspections at more than 140 locations, entering without prior notice into Iraqi industrial facilities, munitions factories, military establishments, private residences, and presidential palaces, following up on inspection leads provided by other States"
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/12/18/391577/romney-iraq-dodge-appropriate-at-the-time/

Romney has told this lie before:
On War & Peace: FactCheck: Saddam didn't refuse UN inspectors prior to war
Romney tried to pin the blame for the Iraq war on Saddam Hussein's refusal to allow weapons inspections.
ROMNEY: If Saddam Hussein had opened up his country to IAEA inspectors, and they'd come in and they'd found that there were no WMDs, had Saddam Hussein, therefore, not violated UN resolutions, we wouldn't be in the conflict we're in. But he didn't do those things.
Romney is not alone in playing loose with the facts about weapons inspections. On at least 3 occasions in 2003, Pres. Bush has made the same claim. However, that the UN's IAEA was not permitted to make inspections might come as a bit of a surprise to Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the IAEA, who reported on March 17, 2003, that "late last night I was advised by the US government to pull out our inspectors from Baghdad." Inspectors had been in Iraq since November 2002. They remained until the UN Secretary-General ordered their evacuation on March 17, just three days before US and British troops invaded Iraq.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2007 GOP debate at Saint Anselm College Jun 3, 2007
http://www.issues2000.org/Archive/2007_FactCheck_Mitt_Romney.htm

‪http://tinyurl.com/PeaceOnEarthPossible

Iran's nuclear power plant and public statements by Iranian leaders

Iran creates electricity in its nuclear power plant. Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapon and says it doesn't want one, so claiming “Iran threatened to use a nuclear weapon” doesn't even make sense.

Iran’s leaders have publicly stated they don't want nuclear weapons and have explicitly said they have no intention of starting a war. For example, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, stated, “We have no problem with the world. We are not a threat whatsoever to the world, and the world knows it. We will never start a war. We have no intention of going to war with any state.” and President Ahmadinejad has said, “The Iranian nation is highly civilized and has a very rich culture and is not after oppressing any other nation, or launching an aggressive attack against anyone.” and “We have said numerous times and say it over and again: we have no atomic bomb, we want no atomic bomb and we need no atomic bomb.” BUT U.S. mass media has extremely UNDERREPORTED what they said to the point where hardly any American knows it.

Rare Exception to Media Blackout of Media Blackout VIDEOS

PASS IT ON ☛ Tinyurl.com/MSMBlackout

See BOTH Rare Exception to Media Blackout of Media Blackout & Media Blackout! What Police did to the Press & what MSM DIDN'T!