Thursday, June 11, 2015

How could this statement make sense to you?


Mike,

How could this statement make sense to you if your theory is correct? "... the Mujahideen saw the black gang of thugs in the White House hiding the Truth, and their stupid and foolish leader, who is elected and supported by his people, denying reality and proclaiming that we (the Mujahideen) were striking them because we were jealous of them (the Americans), whereas the reality is that we are striking them because of their evil and injustice in the whole of the Islamic World, especially in Iraq and Palestine and their occupation of the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries." -Osama Bin Laden , February 14 , 2003

Why would these words be spoken from what you claim is "fake"? You can see how the media spun it by omitting these words from news reports about the tape recording. http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/14/binladen.tape/ 

U.S. officials don't deny it was bin Laden talking. We know why they would want to omit parts. The question is why "create" those parts only to then suppress them?  The thing that makes no sense is that if what you claim is true in your theory, then why in the world would "secret agents" fake a message saying Bush is a liar? Why would "secret agents" fake a message saying that the real reason for the attack is because of the Americans's "evil and injustice in the whole of the Islamic World, especially in Iraq and Palestine and their occupation of the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries."? You know the powers that be like to insist that the reasons were along the lines of Bush's explanation for the motive, so why "secret agents" "create" a tape that says calls Bush a liar about his claim about what the motives were?

-Tom

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Manufacturing Consent 2.0

Manufacturing Consent 2.0 Links What YouTube is doing to the ‪Representative Press‬ channel could be called Manufacturing Consent 2.0 I talk about it in this video:‪ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMECO9mUrnA‬ and at the end of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sijMX3voPOo&feature=youtu.be&t=3m47s


Byline interviewed Noam Chomsky, to find out his views on the current media landscape. Are the media still "manufacturing consent"? https://www.byline.com/column/3/article/7

"an alternative model is public support for the widest possible range of information and analysis and that should, I think, be a core part of a functioning democracy." http://marker.to/ZBMvf4

Think about retrofitting Voice of America through legislation to mandate that it be totally under the control of the people, totally transparent and dedicated to serving the needs of all Americans. Think how fast we could reach that tangible goal. https://www.youtube.com/user/RepresentativePress/about

"In the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, besides using printing contracts to subsidize favored party organs, the federal government supported the press in what First Amendment lawyers today would call a "viewpoint-neutral" way--through cheap postal rates that were available to all newspapers. And since the 1960s, both the federal and state governments have aided public broadcasting, which has enabled public TV and radio stations to become important sources of news." - Will the Last Reporter Please Turn out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done To Fix It by Robert W. McChesney (Editor), Victor Pickard (Editor)


Manufacturing Consent - Noam Chomsky and the Media

Will the Last Reporter Please Turn out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done To Fix It by Robert W. McChesney (Editor), Victor Pickard (Editor)

VIDEOS: 
Chomsky Hitler History Lesson and MORE


Manufacturing Consent 2.0 Links

What YouTube is doing to the ‪Representative Press‬ channel could be called Manufacturing Consent 2.0 I talk about it in this video:‪ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMECO9mUrnA‬ and at the end of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sijMX3voPOo&feature=youtu.be&t=3m47s


Byline interviewed Noam Chomsky, to find out his views on the current media landscape. Are the media still "manufacturing consent"? https://www.byline.com/column/3/article/7

"an alternative model is public support for the widest possible range of information and analysis and that should, I think, be a core part of a functioning democracy." http://marker.to/ZBMvf4

Think about retrofitting Voice of America through legislation to mandate that it be totally under the control of the people, totally transparent and dedicated to serving the needs of all Americans. Think how fast we could reach that tangible goal. https://www.youtube.com/user/RepresentativePress/about

"In the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, besides using printing contracts to subsidize favored party organs, the federal government supported the press in what First Amendment lawyers today would call a "viewpoint-neutral" way--through cheap postal rates that were available to all newspapers. And since the 1960s, both the federal and state governments have aided public broadcasting, which has enabled public TV and radio stations to become important sources of news." - Will the Last Reporter Please Turn out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done To Fix It by Robert W. McChesney (Editor), Victor Pickard (Editor)


Manufacturing Consent - Noam Chomsky and the Media

Will the Last Reporter Please Turn out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done To Fix It by Robert W. McChesney (Editor), Victor Pickard (Editor)

VIDEOS: 
Chomsky Hitler History Lesson and MORE