accersitusmaximus writes, "Regarding the truth movement. It's actually mostly about questions. Questions like, why Osama Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI. Questions like why the Bush administration opposed the investigation on 9/11 (441 days). Then you have historical records such as Tonkin lie and the declassified plans of Operation Northwoods. Not to mention "Project for the New American Century" and the oil factor. It's not OK to ask questions? How do you proceed to get some answers?"
My reply: "accersitusmaximus, there are such things as loaded questions. Misleading people is not OK. And bin Laden IS wanted by the FBI, so your "honest" question contained a falsehood."
posted to the video "9/11 Truth Movement" Suppresses Bush Contradiction with Intelligence Agencies: Bush Lies
Friday, August 29, 2008
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Digg Pelosi Question Now: Who gave you the right to take impeachment off the table? Aren't you violating your oath when you refuse to impeach a war cr
SEE VIDEO: Digg Pelosi Question Now: Who gave you the right to take impeachment off the table? Aren't you violating your oath when you refuse to impeach a war criminal?
Digg the question here Digg is interviewing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who will be in the spotlight with your questions presented by Digg CEO Jay Adelson on Wednesday 8/27 at the Democratic National Convention in Denver. Digg John Perry's question please.
After you do that, you could Digg this to help promote this video:
http://digg.com/politics/hey_nancy_let_s_talk_impeachment?OTC-em-st1
"A Nuremberg chief prosecutor says there is a case for trying Bush for the 'supreme crime' against humanity, an illegal war of aggression against a sovereign nation."
See John Perry's video here & see my video here
Digg Pelosi Question, Promote Impeachment
Digg the question here Digg is interviewing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who will be in the spotlight with your questions presented by Digg CEO Jay Adelson on Wednesday 8/27 at the Democratic National Convention in Denver. Digg John Perry's question please.
After you do that, you could Digg this to help promote this video:
http://digg.com/politics/hey_nancy_let_s_talk_impeachment?OTC-em-st1
"A Nuremberg chief prosecutor says there is a case for trying Bush for the 'supreme crime' against humanity, an illegal war of aggression against a sovereign nation."
See John Perry's video here & see my video here
Digg Pelosi Question, Promote Impeachment
Friday, August 15, 2008
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
NIST FAQ
NIST FAQ
NIST FAQ 8/30/06
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (August 30, 2006)
"NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower."
NIST FAQ 8/30/06
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (August 30, 2006)
"NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower."
NIST FAQ 12/14/07
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Supplement (December 14, 2007)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Supplement (December 14, 2007)
Also see Tinyurl.com/WTC7FAQ
Monday, August 11, 2008
On 9/11, WTC1 Hit WTC7, Seriously Damaging the South Side
On 9/11, WTC1 Hit WTC7, Seriously Damaging the South Side
See Video:
"The biggest decision we had to make on the first day was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building heavily involved in fire. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt.
I issued the orders to pull back the firefighters and define the collapse zone. It was a critical decision; we could not lose any more firefighters. It took a lot of time to pull everyone out, given the emotionalism of the day, communications difficulties, and the collapse terrain. - FDNY Chief of Department Daniel Nigro, Report from the Chief of Department, Fire Engineering, 9/2002
See Video:
"The biggest decision we had to make on the first day was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building heavily involved in fire. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt.
I issued the orders to pull back the firefighters and define the collapse zone. It was a critical decision; we could not lose any more firefighters. It took a lot of time to pull everyone out, given the emotionalism of the day, communications difficulties, and the collapse terrain. - FDNY Chief of Department Daniel Nigro, Report from the Chief of Department, Fire Engineering, 9/2002
Friday, August 08, 2008
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
Friday, August 01, 2008
There was an error processing your comment. Please try again.
I keep getting "There was an error processing your comment. Please try again." So I'll put the reply I have been trying for several times to post to the channel here:(this is to a YouTuber who calls himself "Israelfnp")
You dishonestly wrote, "What's wrong Reppress, you have time to answer everyone but me?" Israelfnp, must you continuously be dishonest? Anyone can search through the comments and see that I have responded to you and your falsehoods more than once. And anyone can see that I don't answer "everyone," the reason is simply time. Fact is, I have answered you more than once and I have not answered "everyone else." I may get to questions from you or others, it depends on time and resources. How about a donation to help me with my efforts if you are so eager to hear my opinion? I have already debunked a few of your falsehoods on the channel page and pointed you to my blog which debunks many more.
You dishonestly wrote, "What's wrong Reppress, you have time to answer everyone but me?" Israelfnp, must you continuously be dishonest? Anyone can search through the comments and see that I have responded to you and your falsehoods more than once. And anyone can see that I don't answer "everyone," the reason is simply time. Fact is, I have answered you more than once and I have not answered "everyone else." I may get to questions from you or others, it depends on time and resources. How about a donation to help me with my efforts if you are so eager to hear my opinion? I have already debunked a few of your falsehoods on the channel page and pointed you to my blog which debunks many more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)