NEW VIDEO: McCain Confronted on USS Liberty Cover-up & Media AccomplicesWednesday, June 20, 2012
Saturday, June 09, 2012
Sunday, June 03, 2012
Where were YOU
(In response to this question: "Where were YOU when the two white guys, Deadeye and Codpiece, were in office? Cuddausedya to spread the word back then."):
I was right here in America, trying to get the very same message out. I was walking the streets of NYC with this sign trying to get the truth out. I was posting flyers around NYC in Union Square mainly ONLY TO HAVE MANY RIPPED DOWN! (one of them with only the part mentioning Israel ripped off and leaving the rest of the flyer) I was protesting the planed war on Afghanistan, marching with thousands of others uptown in a protest march against the Afghanistan war. I noticed the press were not covering it (and we were right near the NYT so I went into the lobby and complained to someone and they had me talk to someone upstairs on the phone and I asked why weren't they covering the march. I also asked them why they were ignoring the analysis of people like Noam Chomsky as far as the motives for the terrorist attack on 9/11. The NYT, along with major media, violated the social contract in this country by EITHER NOT REPORTING THE MARCH OR UNDERREPORING IT. * UPDATE: During research for video of the march (which I didn't see covered on TV) I did find out that Amy Goodman corrects her statement about the NYT not reporting at all and says that there is an article on page B12 (So it turns out to be an example of underreporting given the importants of 10,000 people marching in protest) They violated our dignity, this system is bullshit. There is extreme deception being perpetrated on the public, the NYT is nowhere close ideologically to what people are constantly being led to believe. To put the coverage of such a large march back on to page B12 about a protest march where thousands marched in NYC is an extreme violation and exposes the powers that be as the ruthless underhanded thugs that they are. They have no respect for the people, it's all about elite power. One of the most vicious violations of our dignity is when the mainstream media fed us the self-serving lie that we were attacked because of our freedoms.
They new damn well why we were attacked, in fact, in the years since, I have looked at the broadcast footage and discovered that Tom Brokaw slipped and read the news of the motive on the morning of 9/11 when he apparently read straight from the Reuters news wire: "Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden warned three weeks ago that he and his followers would carry out an unprecedented attack on U.S. interests for its support of Israel, an Arab journalist with access to him said Tuesday."(He starts reading it at 11:06 AM by saying, "We have a report here that ...") I think its clear that in the heat of the moment, Tom Brokaw slipped and reported the news because neither Tom Brokaw nor NBC made mention of the motive for the rest of the day and evening of 9/11 and onward, as you may know, this pattern continued. You can see right here in this video Dan Rather showing how a pro can continue the suppression even in the heat of the moment, watch as he self censors himself and doesn't make the same slip of reporting the news as Brokaw did on the morning of 9/11. (Remember Tom Brokaw continued on air through to the evening and motive was not mentioned by him again nor did Andrea Mitchell report it to the public.)
And it looks like Tom Brokaw doesn't want to admit to himself that he betrayed his country by playing along with the suppression of the motive for the worst attack on the U.S. in U.S. history because his Apr 13, 2011 question for a world leader was asking Osama bin Laden why he attacked on 9/11.
I was right here in America, trying to get the very same message out. I was walking the streets of NYC with this sign trying to get the truth out. I was posting flyers around NYC in Union Square mainly ONLY TO HAVE MANY RIPPED DOWN! (one of them with only the part mentioning Israel ripped off and leaving the rest of the flyer) I was protesting the planed war on Afghanistan, marching with thousands of others uptown in a protest march against the Afghanistan war. I noticed the press were not covering it (and we were right near the NYT so I went into the lobby and complained to someone and they had me talk to someone upstairs on the phone and I asked why weren't they covering the march. I also asked them why they were ignoring the analysis of people like Noam Chomsky as far as the motives for the terrorist attack on 9/11. The NYT, along with major media, violated the social contract in this country by EITHER NOT REPORTING THE MARCH OR UNDERREPORING IT. * UPDATE: During research for video of the march (which I didn't see covered on TV) I did find out that Amy Goodman corrects her statement about the NYT not reporting at all and says that there is an article on page B12 (So it turns out to be an example of underreporting given the importants of 10,000 people marching in protest) They violated our dignity, this system is bullshit. There is extreme deception being perpetrated on the public, the NYT is nowhere close ideologically to what people are constantly being led to believe. To put the coverage of such a large march back on to page B12 about a protest march where thousands marched in NYC is an extreme violation and exposes the powers that be as the ruthless underhanded thugs that they are. They have no respect for the people, it's all about elite power. One of the most vicious violations of our dignity is when the mainstream media fed us the self-serving lie that we were attacked because of our freedoms.
They new damn well why we were attacked, in fact, in the years since, I have looked at the broadcast footage and discovered that Tom Brokaw slipped and read the news of the motive on the morning of 9/11 when he apparently read straight from the Reuters news wire: "Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden warned three weeks ago that he and his followers would carry out an unprecedented attack on U.S. interests for its support of Israel, an Arab journalist with access to him said Tuesday."(He starts reading it at 11:06 AM by saying, "We have a report here that ...") I think its clear that in the heat of the moment, Tom Brokaw slipped and reported the news because neither Tom Brokaw nor NBC made mention of the motive for the rest of the day and evening of 9/11 and onward, as you may know, this pattern continued. You can see right here in this video Dan Rather showing how a pro can continue the suppression even in the heat of the moment, watch as he self censors himself and doesn't make the same slip of reporting the news as Brokaw did on the morning of 9/11. (Remember Tom Brokaw continued on air through to the evening and motive was not mentioned by him again nor did Andrea Mitchell report it to the public.)
And it looks like Tom Brokaw doesn't want to admit to himself that he betrayed his country by playing along with the suppression of the motive for the worst attack on the U.S. in U.S. history because his Apr 13, 2011 question for a world leader was asking Osama bin Laden why he attacked on 9/11.
Saturday, June 02, 2012
It was clear before the election that Obama was a war pig.
I was just thinking about Moore and what a shit he was for not endorsing Kucinich in the primaries. He actually stood on the same stage at a press conference about universal heath care legislation yet he didn't endorse Kucinich. And it was clear before the election that Obama was a war pig. And what is Moore doing now? If he doesn't want us stuck with Obama again, why the hell isn't he doing something to prevent it? Why the hell aren't more people saying the Democratic Party better not nominate Obama because Obama violated the Constitution with his BS war in Libya sold on the lie that he "had to" because civilians were going to be killed and Obama has the audacity to claim the war isn't even hostilities!
Obama needs to be impeached NOW. Obama is also personally involved in the murder of civilians right now. How much longer are we going to put up with this bullshit? As to Fahrenheit 9/11, that was also a major disappointment because it was so deceptive. What was Moore's motive for saying "it was the Saudis" who did 9/11 when we know it was al-Qaeda and that their motive was outrage over U.S. support of Israel and other oppressive regimes including Saudi Arabia? Was the fool trying to start a war with Saudi Arabia? Glaringly absent from his movie is mention of the role US support of Israel had in motivating the 9/11 attack. Moore sure as hell didn't communicate the message that bin Laden was trying to get across.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
