Why Osama bin Laden Attacked the US

 The video "Why Osama bin Laden Attacked the US" pushes an outright lie. I have made many videos on the main motive for the 9/11 attack (anger at US support of Israel) and several videos directly addressing the fact that people are lying about the motivation to suppress the main motive for the attack. see Rather Outrageous Suppression of the Main Motive for 9/11 Attacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQiUXc_aMoo&list=PLF81BB573C9C0C7B2&index=4

I also have written many times exposing the fact that people have been lying about bin Laden's motivation. I even cited  The Bin Laden I Know, Peter Bergen where Bergen makes the point that people have been lying about bin Laden's motivation: "Conventional wisdom has it that bin Laden adopted the Palestinians issue only recently. Reading this declaration [the first declaration of war, issued in 1996] SHOULD PUT THAT CANARD TO REST." p164 The Bin Laden I Know, Peter Bergen 

And you can see at the following link that I traced back bin Laden's earliest expression of this grievance to at least as far back as 1984:  

https://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/08/osama-bin-laden-has-been-angry-about.html

BTW, 

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was the mastermind of the 9/11 attack: 

"Sheikh Mohammed said that the purpose of the attack on the Twin Towers was to "wake the American people up." Sheikh Mohammed said that if the target would have been strictly military or government, the American people would not focus on the atrocities that America is committing by supporting Israel against the Palestinian people and America's self-serving foreign policy that corrupts Arab governments and leads to further exploitation of the Arab/Muslim peoples." (source: The Osama Bin Laden I Know: An Oral History of Al Qaeda's Leader By Peter L. Bergen p 418 )

Ramzi Yousef is 

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's nephew and 

Ramzi Yousef was the mastermind of the first attack on the WTC, the attack in 1993:

I remember the same game of suppression played after the 1993 attack on the WTC, almost no one wanted to report what the motive was even though it was made clear by Ramzi Yousef: "Yousef sent a letter to the New York Times after the 1993 bombing attack on the WTC, "We declare our responsibility for the explosion on the mentioned building. This action was done in response for the American political, economical, and military support to Israel the state of terrorism and to the rest of the dictator countries in the region.""

"Yousef said he took no thrill from killing American citizens and felt guilty about the civilian deaths he had caused. But his conscience was overridden by his desire to stop the killing of Arabs by Israeli troops." "Yousef said he "would like it to be different," but only terrible violence could force this kind of abrupt political change. He said that he truly believed his actions had been rational and logical in pursuit of a change in U.S. policy toward Israel. He mentioned no other motivation during the flight and no other issue in American foreign policy that concerned him." (source: Steve Coll, Ghost Wars p273 )

https://representativepress.blogspot.com/2013/10/focus-on-atrocities-that-america-is.html

You can search my blog for more info and my channel for more videos about this.

Sincerely,

Tom Murphy

Representative Press

ICC

 If the West's narrative about the Ukraine war was correct, why didn't the ICC charge Russian officials with launching a war of aggression? It looks foolish for the ICC to focus on allegedly kidnapping children when Western nations CLAIM Putin launched an illegal war because the crime of aggression "is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” as the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg stated. 

The reason isn't difficult to understand, the ICC knows they can't claim Russia launched a war of aggression so Putin is not guilty of such a thing. BUT Ukraine's preplanned assault (in March 2021, Zelensky issued decrees for that) and the starting of that assault in mid-Feb 2022  (both of which ignore the UN Security Council's Resolution 2202,) shows it is UKRAINE that is guilty! “Aggression in its essence has been defined as “state conduct that either initiates war against another state or brings about a situation in which the victim is (or may be) driven to war”

Your Account is locked for 4 days and 4 hours ... 6 days and 21 hours

 

Twitter Is Still Allowing False Accusations To Get People Suspended

 I have been hit with a false 'harassment' accusation and Twitter has locked my @RepPress account.  Please retweet to Elon Musk and others, I thought this mistreatment was supposed to end with Musk.

LINK to Coup Video on Twitter video

I get suspended from Twitter because a dishonest person makes a false claim of harassment against me. The Twitter support team thinks using the words 'idiot,' stupid' and 'dumb' justifies a suspension from Twitter?! 

Meanwhile, I have been on Twitter for 15 years and have 2,332 Followers AND I am paying to have a Blue Checkmark with Twitter yet they side with a dishonest person who joined less than 2 1/2 years ago, has 33 Followers, and no Blue Checkmark.

BTW, this is the kind of person we are talking about, see highlighted:

VIDEO Your Account is locked for 4 days and 4 hours ... 6 days and 21 hours

 

What the U.S. Bombing of the Nord Stream Pipeline Shows Us

 📢“Planning took place late in 2021” for the Nord Stream bombing and that shows how the U.S. narrative about the Ukraine/Russia conflict is BS‼️ The U.S. goal had been to sabotage natural gas sales between Germany & Russia so the U.S. WANTED a conflict between Ukraine & Russia that U.S. officials could use as a pretext to destroy the gas pipeline.

The U.S. intentionally endangered Russia's security as a way to provoke a response that U.S. planners could then use as an excuse for themselves and other government operatives for carrying out such an extreme act of sabotage. Without the so-called “unprovoked attack” by Russia, U.S. officials wouldn't have an excuse to get U.S. operatives to follow orders for a plan to destroy the gas pipeline.

And if you look at the negotiations, you can see why the U.S. rejected Russia's reasonable security demands, demands that the U.S. expects and gets for what it considers its own security requirements in the Western Hemisphere!

Video link

It explains why Zelesnsky was told to publicly pretend that Ukraine would be joining NATO even though they told him that it would not. Zelensky HIMSELF has admitted to perpetrating this deception at the direction of NATO countries.

So the U.S. agenda had been to do whatever it took (and it took Ukraine drastically increasing the bombing of Donbas in mid-Feb 2022) to get Russia to intervene in Ukraine's civil war.

Colonial Jacques Baud is a former member of the Swiss Strategic Intelligence and worked for NATO on a  NATO program to assist the Ukrainian armed forces in restoring their capacities and improving personnel management.

Russia did not start the war in 2022, it was a civil war started by nationalists in 2014 and which the U.S. intentionally refused to help end.

It's why Ukraine continued to refuse to implement the Minsk Agreements (which would have ended the civil war in Ukraine) that Ukraine had signed and which the UN Security Council called for them to implement!

Video Playlist

Here's recommended reading on How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline: https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream