Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Former CIA Official Exposes Bush Administration Fraud

Former CIA Official Exposes Bush Administration Fraud
Leverett Former CIA Official Exposes Bush Administration Fraud
The Bush Administration is committing fraud again in order to sell another war to the American people. How much fraud do we allow the Bush Administration to commit before we start impeachment proceedings?

Once again spineless cowards in our intelligence agencies are allowing the Bush Administration to commit fraud in order to start another war.

Tell your politicians to do their job to uphold the Constitution and to start impeachment proceedings immediately.

Flynt Leverett worked as a senior director for Middle East affairs at the National Security Council, the NSC, and he was a CIA analyst. Leverett reveals that he has been censored by the White House for purely political reasons.

Flynt Leverett and his wife wrote an Op-Ed for the New York Times but the White House threatened him with criminal prosecution in order to prevent him from publishing his article. Leverett explains that the Bush Administration is abusing its power in order to suppress his article about Iran because they don't want the recent history focused on now. They are trying to control the public debate with the obvious motive to sell a war on Iran. The information that the Bush Administation is preventing from being published in the New York Times Op-Ed reveals that Iran has been cooperating with the US in Afghanistan and had offered to make a deal with the US.

The Bush Administration is claiming that the Op-Ed "contains classified information" even though all the info had already been cleared by the CIA and has been publicly available.

Leverett explains that the White House claim is fraudulent. He also says that people in the intelligence agency who know better are not prepared to speak truth to power. Once again spineless cowards in our intelligence agencies are allowing the Bush Administration to commit fraud in order to start another war. Please watch the video.

Flynt Leverett's report: Dealing with Tehran

See links that show that the Bush Administration has committed fraud before. See background information on the fraud committed by the Bush Administration to get us into the Iraq War:

The Problem Was Not "Faulty Intelligence," the Problem Was Dishonestly Selecting And Omitting Intelligence

Senate Hearing on Iraq Pre-War Intelligence


US Intelligence About Iraq Didn't Really Fail, It Was Manipulated

Beyond all reasonable doubt, the Bush Administration is guilty of the high crime of lying our nation into war.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just heard this video.

And one question remains bobbing in my head..........

WHY ARE "WE THE PEOPLE" AMERICANS STILL PAYING TAXES ?

The constitution does not provide defense for a criminal government. Nor is a criminal government entitled to collect taxes.
Stopping tax NOW, would put an end to all these illegal wars, and the erosion of freedom at home.

truthseeker said...

White House Neocons Manipulating Intel again to Get US to attack Iran for Israel

truthseeker said...

White House Manipulating Intel Again in Order to Have US Attack Iran for Israel Next

truthseeker said...

More about Flynt Leverett and the White House Neocon Push to Censor Him

NO MORE WAR FOR ISRAEL

truthseeker said...

Neocon Elliott Abrams Doesn't Respect the Constitution

Anonymous said...

you claim that the gov. was not behind 9/11 but yet you make videos showing the(cover-up) media lying. you still have questions that have not been answered. how and why is this? is not your gov. media, telling you the truth? your belief system wont allow you to see the truth..... ever heard of flase flag operation? operation northwoods? jfk? USS Liberty? MK-Ultra Project? atomic soldiers? just a few for you to grow-on. the truth hurts, like knowing your born to die. its the truth though. *this is not our gov*

Roger Rancourt said...

Did you hear the news?

Jeff Fisher is going on the radio onDC101 FM

The show is next to a place that Jeff Fisher, formaer United States congressional candidate for District 16 repressenting the Sunshine State (Florida).

H e is going to talk all about Mark Foley and about the Venice airport which Mark Foley was involved in.

From what we have heard its got to with Sibel Edmonds and the Valerie Plame case.

I was wondering if Scooter Liby and Dick (Don't mess with me) Cheney are going to stay around when Fisher talks.

I was wondering how many Internet stations will be listening in.

Radio left
cloa and Dagger
artic Beacon
BArry Chamish
so many

Anonymous said...

On the early morning of 9/11/01, I stood at the corner of Barkley & Church streets in Manhattan on my way to my car on West Street. Here's what I saw:
1. Bldg. #7 collapsed right in its footprint in less than 8 seconds after explosions went off and white puffs of smoke blew out the 3 sides I could see at 2 different levels - above the 40th. fl. & below the 7th. The fires in the Bldg. looked to be purposely set as I saw no one yelling out the windows for help.

2. Towers 1 & 2 had the same experience as #7 after the planes struck them. The smoke coming out of the holes their sides was Black. Then I saw 2 puffs of WHITE smoke shoot out the sides of both building below the big holes and heard rather load explosions and watched the 2 buildings collapse in a heap in less than 10 seconds after the explosions.

3. The Thursday of after 9/11, I was by the back of Trinity Church watching cranes and bulldozers pulling guiders out of the pile. i was shocked to see the bottoms of then melted and twisted, melting with dripping moiten metal at one end or melted with a glowing red and dripping tip(s).

I saw a man I knew who used to work at the Top of the World restaurant. We smiled knowingly because we both knew why their was motlen metal in the basements of the 2 buildings and why they had fell so fast...

Here's a few questions for all you 'True Blue' Americans:
1. Why did no one ever interview and report on the responses of Larry Silverstein, owner of the asbestose-ridden abertroses?
(a) Silverstein's maid &/or butler?
(b) Marvin Bush whose Co. owned the WTC's building security system?
(c) Maintenance men & guards at the 3 towers who discreetly reported seeing unlabeled grey Vans and uniformed workmen enter and exit the basements and parking garages near the 3 buildings 4-8 weeks PRIOR TO 9/11?

2. Why did the government move the debris from the 3 building sites so quickly TO CHINA!?
Why were Firement, Cops and others at the site after the buildings came down threatened spectators quietly by folks who identified thenselves as FBI and CIA?

3. Why didn't cellphones suddenly stop working on 9/11 then MYSTERIOUSLY start working again in less than 4 hrs. but only 4 or MORE blocks from the WTC sites?!

4. Why were thew windows of the 'plane' that hit Bldg. #2 have its ALL ITS WINDOWS CLEARLY COVERED? And the hole at each building struck, SMALLER thsn the plane that supposedly created it?!

5. How come there were NO 747/757 engines, wings, tails, luggage or body parts at the 'strike sites'!?

6. Why wasn't there no PLANE debris in the WTC bldgs. wreakage?!

7. Why did BBC report on the news about #7 plunging straight down over 20 minutes BEFORE it happened?

8. Regarding the PA & Pentagon sites,where was the 757 wreackage,
engines, wings, tail, luggage and bodies?!
And WHY did the same 757 jet show up at a nearby airport about the same time the Pentagon was hit?!

9. How could a 757 blast through the side of the Pentagon with its super thick reenforced concrete walls, leave NO debris but leave behing a huge nose-shaped dent?!

10. What about the other planes and the missle-shapped objects that flew by the WTC bldgs in the first instance and STRUCK it and PASSED ON THRU in the SECOND?!

11. When he was contacted with the news of the disasters, why was the president so calm and almost disinterested?

The questions go on and one including those regarding Wolfowitz' 'companion's' involvement and that of the Saudis.

Americans have lost America...

Anonymous said...

There were no planes.

Queitsch Hof said...

dear roger rancourt
I believe you. I realize that only our administration had the type of explosives and the money to co ordinate such an attack with such precision. There were some planes hitting the WTT but more than likely drones which could go at such high speeds recorded by the radar controllers. They were probably operated by the AWAC plane flying above on that day, as part of the NORAD drill "practicing" hitting the WTT with 2 planes. The real flight 93 landed in Cleveland. The people selected to die were probably put to sleep and never knew what happened and flown out to sea, and I am not sure if a study has ever been done of how many of those passenger names were real. Now that we know nothing can be trusted I would be curious. We know that they faked 2 names - his brother died the year before he was accused of being a highjacker and he was alive and well.

Quote 9 11 official report:
"Atta and Omari, along with Satam al Suqami, Wail al Shehri, and Waleed al Shehri, checked in and boarded American Airlines Flight 11, bound for Los Angeles."

None of these men are listed on the Bbston flight by the airlines. The al Sheri brothers are both alive. Satam is the one they miraculously found a passport in a pile in the WTT, yet nothing connects him to the flights.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/fbi_denies_mix_up_of_911_terrorists.htm

FBI Director Robert Mueller in September 2002 told CNN twice that there is "no legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers." After that admission a strange thing happened - nothing. No follow-up stories. No follow-up questions. There was dead silence and the story disappeared. Note that he says "highjacker"- now it is pretty much proven that cell phone calls from that elevation in 2001 were impossible. The army has an advance method of reproducing voices with only 10 seconds recording of your voice.

1964 said...

Taxes are a key part of the Citizen United SCOTUS decision, it affirms that money is a form of speech, no? Therefore, not paying taxes is political speech.