Friday, March 30, 2007

Engineer said the Twin Towers were in Danger of Collapse

Engineer said the Twin Towers were in Danger of Collapse

"At 9:46, the Chief of Department called an additional fifth alarm, and at 9:54
an additional 20 engine and 6 ladder companies were sent to the WTC. As a
result, more than one-third of all FDNY companies now had been dispatched
to the WTC. At about 9:57, an EMS paramedic approached the FDNY Chief of
Department and advised that an engineer in front of 7 WTC had just remarked
that the Twin Towers in fact were in imminent danger of a total collapse.
- p302 The 9/11 Commission Report

(The South Tower collapsed at 9:59)


Jeff_Munro said...

Hello! My name is Jeff. I found your site on Technorati and really liked what I saw and read. I was wondering if you would be interested in featuring one of my many websites in one of your posts. I am trying to build the popularity of my sites but it seems very difficult to do that without paying for ad space. That is why I am trying to get people with rich quality content and nice looking sites to maybe write a little article about my sites. My sites include which is my main blog, which is my wallpaper website, which is my celebrity wallpaper site and finally is my World Trade Center Photo website. Hopefully you will consider writing something about one of my sites. Thank you very much and please feel free to e-mail me if you have any questions (you can find my email on my blog) :)


Anonymous said...

Hey Tom are you NSA, CIA or FBI? Only someone who has no knowledge of physics would support such a laughable collapse theory as that presented by NIST. Dont forget Tom that NIST cant even tell us why Building 7 collpased. Your claim on the 'video evidence' is a joke. Watch the video. Can any of your government hacks explain the horizontal displacement of huge pieces of debris hundreds of feet out from the towers? Gravity only works downward you moron. Where is the horizontal velocity coming from? But I'm sure you remember your first year University physics course. Oh, thats right you probably dont have that kind of education. Makes the brain hurt. Just let NIST think for you. Your a complete fraud an your website is a joke. Is Chomsky the only intellectual you could muster for an attack against legitimate questions (admittedly unanswered or outright ignored by NIST or the 911 Commission Report) about the collapse of the buildings. Chomsky may have good intentions, but unfortunately he suffers from the very brainwashing that he so eloquently describes in his voluminous publications on the subject of propaganada. By the way, he is not an engineer or materials scientist last I checked. And we all know MIT is a NSA/CIA recruitment camp.

Anonymous said...

Tom, if you really want answers, go do some real research.


Anonymous said...

People are not as stupid as you think. There is no serious science in any of the government's official story of 9/11 that you so blindly support. You are the one who has come to the conclusion before even investigating the facts.
Your deflection to the problem of US-Israeli foreign policy and focus on apparent motives of the chosen enemy is classic. You want to be seen as anti-establishment, but we know who you serve.
Your mission has already failed. And by the way, any agency operatives working in your midst should know that when the shit hits the fan, they are expendable - not to mention they are being duped into becoming traitors to their country. Remember that the path to hell is paved with good intentions. You are not as important as you think. Your sense of power and privilege is fleeting, and as soon as your masters feel the heat, guess who is used as a heat shield. That's right, the lowly field operative who thinks he's got it made making, what, a nice cushy six-figure salary. Something to think about in the grand scheme of things.

Anonymous said...

It’s interesting that of all press websites one can visit, it is easy to look up who the directors and chief editors are, their business address and contact phone numbers, etc., you know - credentials - something your 'representative press' website is conveniently lacking. In fact it is devoid of any signs of legitimacy whatsoever. The only 'person' that seems to be identified at your URL is 'contact'. Is this person new to the organization? Why doesn't any real person want to be associated with your organization? If you are grass-roots, then where is the sod?

Fraudulently Yours,

yohrd said...

honestly, i cannot understand what came to Chomsky's mind to try so blindly to debunk (even at any "logical" rate) any "conspiracy theory" or to support all those debunking of debunking of debunking theories, etc... gosh! what's going in here? my opinion, if i go to catch any source of information available, try to understand them and then try to form my own opinion about the facts... i think that controlled demolition is in fact what better explains the way those buildings has collapsed, specially the building 7 case, anyway, come on... the free fall speed is something too hard to explain, don't you think so? ...and after all i do agree with most of the anonimous comments up here!!!