Someone Sent Me a Fraudulent Video Trying to Prove Controlled Demolition
See the report for yourself:
http://wtc.nist.gov/reports_october05.htm
See NIST's FAQ:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
You seem like an intelligent guy, but you might want to avoid using NIST to back your allegations. Check out the press release at:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2007/3/emw515165.htm.
Note Judy Wood's credentials and then consider the info on her site.
Then view these four short videos:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7094370627958457222
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5182535448932065917
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2364206678564389150
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDJArP-MfyM
Finally, go back to the first video, slide the control to the 03:22 mark and play the next 6 seconds while watching the tower’s top section closely. The fourth video also shows it at the 00:22 to 00:26 mark.
What does what you see do to the accepted explanation that the massive weight of the tower’s top section is what pancaked the floors below?
You cannot safely use explanations provided by criminals, such as TPTB and their NIST-type lackeys, that are used to cover their own actions.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
this is a great and very complete time line it contains over 5000 entries relating to 9/11 alone. That includes investigations and events directly related to AQ and government agencies. All entries are edited and resourced. I think you use the word fraud a bit loosely because noone is (well at least im not) saying that i know as a fact one scenario to be more accurate then another. I think the desire of most who have questions is that we would like an honest investigation. That means access to all information and all parties be at least required to testify and answer questions. This as you know is a problem for the corrupt Bush administration who thumb their nose at the rule of law. Just look at the footage of him at the press conference answering (or not answering rather) questions about the off the record private meeting with Cheney. They are definately hiding something.
(9:50 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Molten Metal Pours from South Tower
Video footage later reveals that in the minutes immediately before the collapse of the WTC’s South Tower, a stream of molten metal starts pouring out of a window opening around the northeast corner of its 80th floor. FEMA later suggests that this is “possibly aluminum from the airliner,” and comments, “This is of particular interest because, although the building collapse appears to have initiated at this floor level, the initiation seems to have occurred at the southeast rather than the northeast corner.” [Civil Engineering, 5/2002; Federal Emergency Management Agency, 5/1/2002, pp. 2-34; Dwyer and Flynn, 2005, pp. 207] According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, “The composition of the flowing material can only be the subject of speculation, but its behavior suggests it could have been molten aluminum.” [Pitts, Butler, and Junker, 9/2005, pp. 375] However physics professor Steven E. Jones will in 2006 dispute this, saying that molten aluminum is silvery and never turns yellow, like what is in the video footage. He will instead claim the presence of this molten metal supports the theory that explosives, specifically thermite, are what caused the Twin Towers to collapse. He says thermite can cause steel to melt and become yellowish. [Deseret Morning News, 4/10/2006]
Entity Tags: World Trade Center
Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
Category Tags: All Day of 9/11 Events, WTC Investigation, 9/11 Investigations, World Trade Center
Anyway Peace my friend. -Rex
Post a Comment