A very popular website keeps insisting that the World Trade Center was brought down by Controlled Demolition. On that site they show you a picture of a steel column that has been cut. But the steel column was cut by an ironworker during the clean up. You can see a cut just like it being made by an iron worker during the clean up of the WTC at this link. (scroll down when you go to the page) Also look at NIST's FAQ page and WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory and Exposing the fact that politicians and pundits are lying about "why they hate us."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
You seem like an intelligent guy, but you might want to avoid using NIST to back your allegations. Check out the press release at:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2007/3/emw515165.htm.
Note Judy Wood's credentials and then consider the info on her site.
Then view these four short videos:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7094370627958457222
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5182535448932065917
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2364206678564389150
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDJArP-MfyM
Finally, go back to the first video, slide the control to the 03:22 mark and play the next 6 seconds while watching the tower’s top section closely. The fourth video also shows it at the 00:22 to 00:26 mark.
What does what you see do to the accepted explanation that the massive weight of the tower’s top section is what pancaked the floors below?
You cannot safely use explanations provided by criminals, such as TPTB and their NIST-type lackeys, that are used to cover their own actions.
Hey Tom,
If the steel was cut by the iron workers, why was this forensic EVIDENCE transported away at break-neck speed to places like CHINA, before it could be spectrographically tested for the source of failure? By the way, removing evidence from the SCENE OF A CRIME is against the law. But of course this doesn't worry you. You have the explanation for everything.
There are standard forensic procedures for analysis of structural steel. Why was the analysis not done by the government? The analysis however was done by Prof. Steven E. Jones who got hold of some of the tower's steel - but of course you wont check out his PEER-REVIEWED scientific studies. You'll just hide behind NIST and parrot your ruler's 'explanations' - which keep changing as more legitimate evidence of government compicity and involvement in 911 comes to light.
I truly feel sorry for you. You are on a sinking ship.
Lol so how does evidence ever leave a crime scene? Christ a testimony came out minutes after this attack, can you guess where?
Some commenters are asking why there were no forensic tests done on the building debris. Maybe that's because 100 million TV viewers and 100K pedestrians on the street SAW what happened on 911?
When the Titanic sank there was no forensic analysis done to prove that nano-thermite were not to blame.
When the Challenger blew up there were no tests done for nano-thermites.
If you think my examples are ludicrous, just look in the mirror. You dopes are asking for 100,000,000 tons of debris to be scrubbed with toothbrushes and reconstructed, because your delusional brains think that you might find Dick Cheney's thumbprint somewhere in the debris.
You are taking partisan politics to an insane level where only moon-bats and unicorns go.
Post a Comment