Mark, you post Jones' paper while ignoring the points I made which debunk it. NIST doesn't claim the core columns pulled the exterior columns in via the floor
And when Jones quotes NIST, "To the extent that the simulations deviated from the photographic evidence or eyewitness reports" and then adds "[e.g., complete collapse occurred]" it shows he is a fool. The photographic evidence and eyewitness reports were of the changes to the buildings BEFORE the collapses, the bowing columns and sagging floors. Jones knows the simulations were not of the collapses but rather of the events that led to the collapse so why does he write such nonsense like "e.g., complete collapse occurred"? The reason is he doesn't want to admit the photographic evidence and eyewitness reports of the changes to the buildings BEFORE the collapses. The buildings were showing signs that the fires were damaging them in the minutes BEFORE the collapses. This debunks the foolish "controlled demolition theory"! What does it take for people to admit basic facts? Why are you posting Jones' garbage and ignoring the facts that debunk it?