Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Jon Stewart shouldn't do this.

SEE VIDEO: Jon Stewart shouldn't do this.

Jon Stewart does an enormous disservice to his audience when he conflates anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.

During a discussion with Peter Bergen about what books bin Laden read, Jon Stewart does an enormous disservice to his audience when he conflates anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. Anti-Zionism ≠ anti-Semitism yet Stewart takes an "intellectually and morally disreputable position" by bringing up "Protocols" (as in "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion") which is a known fraud and very often used as an example of anti-Semitism.

Please Subscribe → Tinyurl.com/JoinEmail
also Tinyurl.com/YouTubeSub and ☒ send email.

Monday, May 14, 2012

Re: Dead Skunk in the Middle of the Road

In the Democratic primaries, there were two candidates that were decent. The elite media marginalized them and MISREPRESENTED the situation and tricked who knows how many Americans (the people who pushed false, misleading, and misdirecting information are people who are in a position to reach millions of Americans and when they do, they abuse their power. And even so called leaders were screwing us over, for example Michael Moore. Why the hell couldn't this man have endorsed Dennis Kucinich in the Democratic primary? Gravel was also in the Democratic primaries, in major debates. Powerful people disappeared this man and others as much as they could get away with. And did you know Hillary was so devious that she thanked the other Democrats who were in the debate with her but omitted mentioning Gravel's name? And one more example of why things are as bad as they are: YouTube, You're Causing Grief. Please Act Decently.
(above is my comment to the blog post Dead Skunk in the Middle of the Road)

Wednesday, May 02, 2012

What IF Iran Did Develop a Nuclear Weapon?

So, What IF Iran Did Get a Nuclear Weapon? Then … So, What IF Iran Did Get a Nuclear Weapon? Then …
Look at this: The premise has been that if Iran gets a nuclear weapon, it will then bomb Israel. That's what the American people have been mislead into thinking because the mainstream media has been misleading them. But look what the response is when the host of this Al Jazeera show ask the Deputy Prime Minister of Israel: what would happen if Iran got a nuclear weapon? Look at the response: "… the consequences of Iran actually having a nuclear weapon, what do you think they would be?"  "I would think that in the first place, if, if things develop the way they – uh – may develop because I hear the others saying. Saudi says 'we'll get nuclear weapon if they do.' Eh, other countries may have the same idea – I have some names in mind I don't want to mention right here. We may start a nuclear race in the world which it didn't have for many, many years." Notice he doesn't say, "oh, they'll bomb Israel." And please take note that there is no basis for that scenario. There is no basis for that false premise that the American have been mislead into accepting.

I don't think any strategic analyst in his right mind thinks that, even if Iran had nuclear weapons, that they'd use them in a first strike. The country would be vaporized.

If you haven't seen this video: Israel's Deputy Prime Minister admits Iran DID NOT threaten to wipe Israel out, please do or watch it again and give it a boost, it's really doing well for just the first 2 or 3 days. Millions of people need to see this because once again the American public has been manipulated about the facts of the Middle East and about Israel.

I've heard from people – they're not getting their new subscriptions so please subscribe: Please subscribe to the e-mail list and join the 2 Facebooks (1, 2) and bookmark the Representative Press page and we'll just keep hammering at this platform.