Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Journalistic Malpractice: Iraq, 9/11 and US support of Israel

Journalistic Malpractice: Iraq, 9/11 and US support of Israel

Journalistic Malpractice: Iraq, 9/11 and US support of Israel

Mainstream media certainly has not made it easy to understand what motivated the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11.

SCANDAL: 9/11 Commissioners Bowed to Pressure to Suppress Main Motive for the 9/11 Attacks.

Deceptions Sell Israel to Americans

Israeli soldiers often intentionally murder and maim children.

Dishonesty about 9/11 motives robs Americans of the freedom to decide for ourselves if we want to put our lives at risk over specific foreign policies.

The Gorilla in the Room is US Support for Israel.

Mainstream Media, the 9/11 Commission Report, politicians and pundits have all downplayed and/or omitted the fact that the main motive for the 9/11 attacks was outrage over U.S. support of Israel. Here is a rare exception to the suppression, it comes from The Forward.

Also see: The continuing BS from AP


Anonymous said...

you claim that the gov. was not behind 9/11 but yet you make videos showing the(cover-up) media lying. you still have questions that have not been answered. how and why is this? is not your gov. media, telling you the truth? your belief system wont allow you to see the truth..... ever heard of flase flag operation? operation northwoods? jfk? USS Liberty? MK-Ultra Project? atomic soldiers? just a few for you to grow-on. the truth hurts, like knowing your born to die. its the truth though. *this is not our gov*

Shrink Rat said...

Unfortunately, by not acknowledging government complicity in 9/11 your site - even though it speaks some truth regarding Israel's criminal government - remains a limited hangout.

dr rdw

Tom said...

Duff, The Bush Administration sat on its hands, but it was not an "inside job" Please review the links at this link:

Facts about 9/11. Not Fantasy.

Kelldor said...

Unfortunately, any claim that we must change our foreign policy with regards to our support of Israel will be met with rebuttals claiming this new policy amounts to "appeasement". This in turn generates comparisons to appeasement of the Nazi's in the late '30's. They will say "We have tried appeasement and it didn't work then, so what makes you think it will work now"? Personally, I am not opposed to stopping support of Israel, however, if we did, Jihadists would claim victory over the U.S., and the world would agree with them.

In order for an "Israel disengagement" policy to work, there needs to be a way we can save face or it will go nowhere. Just like Iraq, They want our troops to come home in "Victory".

Solution: Expose previous acts by Israel that are against U.S. interests, i.e:

1) The false flag incident during the 6-day war where 3 Israeli jets posing as Egyptian jets, bombed a U.S. warship in the Med.

2) Israels selling to China of proprietary U.S. avionics technology from the F-16 and prior joint U.S. Israeli F-19 (canceled as a result).

3) Israels selling to China of proprietary U.S. airborne radar technology from AWACS.

This is the type of red-meat needed to inflame Americans against support of Israel. Old issues like these alone won't do it though, only a brand new one would. It'll happen again. When it does, we need to make sure it gets front page coverage, and not buried on pg. 6.