Monday, September 06, 2004

The "anti-Semitic" and "Nazi" canard, AGAIN. Another fan weighs in ...

He writes, "What a load of revisionist crapola!!!!! If this was not a stupid on line posting site I might take the time to tear this shithead apart."

more threats of violence from the Zionist camp, not the first time.

He writes, " Somebody is paying this guy to spend this extreme amount of time and energy recreating history. He will say that I didnt dispute his point so they must be true ... "

You didn't dispute it because you can't. You use threats and here it comes ...

Goebells lives again (the great lie retold becomes the truth)
well anyway .. it matters not ... Israel is here to stay you antisemitic nazi bastard!!

The "anti-Semitic" and "Nazi" canard. Typical.
You sure gave a very poor attempt at hasbara didn't you?

It speaks volumes that you deny basic facts of history. At some point shouldn't the outragous lies told by Zionists tell people something? The lies started with The Myth of a 'Land Without People for a People Without Land"

Guys like the one I quote above and the rest of the Zionists get away with this because people in the media don't have backbones. Is it any surprise? You think an employer is even going to deal with this? Having a reporter labeled as an "anti-Semitic"? No, it is easier to cut them loose and reporters know it. That is why we have dramatic examples of bald faced lies that get spread and go unchallenged.

In his book, The Gun and the Olive Branch, David Hirst has done a great job exposing these games, he gives examples of reporters being intimidated. "Behind closed doors some news types will admit they firmly adhere to the pro-Israeli line because it is editorial policy. cover This issue has long ceased having anything to do with right and wrong, it has simply become policy" Hirst explains "Many journalists privately admit that they fear the retribution of pro-Israel publishers and editors and 'generally understand critical words about Israel to be hazardous to careers'." Mark Schneider said that before he took up political activism on the Palestinians' behalf he wasn't sure the censorship or self-censorship over Israel existed. But Schneider now says, "I used to be skeptical about ... allegations of censorship and self-censorship in the American media, but now I've seen it first-hand." Schneider recounts how he witnessed the Rev. Bob Kinsey being asked by a reporter in the studio what the main reasons for troubles in the Middle East were. "Rev Kinsey spoke of the massive US military aid to Israel and the resulting instability it caused. The reporter's stunning reply: 'While I agree with you, if I say anything about US geopolitical interests with Israel, I might as well clean off my desk. ' Of course, the interview was never aired."

David Hirst's book is a must have. It is an updated edition and it is increadible.

David Hirst, The Gun and the Olive Branch: The Roots of Violence in the Middle East, Nation Books; 2nd edition 2003 p57

The point is thanks to people like the guy screaming "nazi" and "anti-semite" and the cowardly press, the American public doesn't understand the basics about Israel. The above threats are nothing new, Zionists have even killed other Jews who dared speak out against the racist agenda in the 1920s. More recently the violence agaisnt Jews who displease radical Zionist Jews is still evident, an Israeli even killed their own leader Rabin because he couldn't stand a miniscule move towards some agreement with the Palestinians.

Thomas Friedman and the NYT are notorious for outright lying and distorting the historical record in order to serve the Zionist agenda. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE HOW EXTREME THE LYING AND MANIPULATION THEY ARE SUBJECTED TO REALLY IS!! Chomsky has documented many lies the NYT and Friedman tell in order to serve Israel:

"As the newspaper of Record, the New York Times has had to be more careful than most to safeguard the preferred version of history. To cite a few additional (and typical) examples, one priority has been to preserve the image of the United States and Israel as moderates seeking peace, faced with the terror and unremitting rejectionism of their Arab adversaries, particularly the unspeakable Palestinians. Accordingly, public PLO support in 1976 for Israel's "sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence" and its "right to live in peace within secure and recognize boundaries" is down the memory hole, even more deeply than Sadat's "famous milestone" of 1971. Similarly, when Yasser Arafat issued several calls for negotiations leading to mutual recognition in April-May 1984, the Times refused to print not only the facts but even letters referring to them. When its Jerusalem correspondent Thomas Friedman reviewed "Two Decades of Seeking Peace in the Middle East" a few months later, the major Arab(including PLO) initiatives of these two decades were excluded, and discussion was restricted to the official "peace process": various U.S. rejectionist proposals." p241 World Orders Old and New

One of the most insulting things is the way Friedman and others slap treat the victims of 9/11 and every other American whose life is in harm's way largely because of Israel. They lie to the American people about why the terrorists attack us. In fact they lie about many of the basic facts surrounding the issue of the 9/11 motives.

Here is a lie that I discovered that Thomas Friedman wrote in order to serve his favorite country (and this guy gets away with this): Friedman writes, "the fact is that bin Laden never focused on this issue. He only started talking about "Palestine" after September 11, when he sensed that he might be losing the support of the Arab street." (p311 of Longitudes & Attitudes ) and "Osama bin Laden never mentioned the Palestinian cause as motivating his actions until he felt he was losing support in the Arab world." (p361-362 of Longitudes & Attitudes ) What Friedman has written is a flat out lie. To give just one example that disproves what Friedman wrote: "Your position against Muslims in Palestine is despicable and disgraceful. America has no shame. " - Osama bin Laden May 1998

Friedman deceives Americans about the facts so he can serve the Israeli agenda (there is a pattern of him writting lies in order to do so.) It is absolutely off the wall how many lies are told to the American people in order to serve the Zionist agenda. “It is still difficult for many to believe that a deception of such magnitude is possible. Deceptions and false declarations have been the standard in the politics of the powerful, and certainly are in Israel’s policy toward the Palestinians from the start.” - Tanya Reinhart There is a very ugly history to the whole thing.

"The Balfour Declaration, made in November 1917 by the British Government...was made a) by a European power, b) about a non-European territory, c) in flat disregard of both the presence and wishes of the native majority resident in that territory...[As Balfour himself wrote in 1919], "The contradiction between the letter of the Covenant (the Anglo French Declaration of 1918 promising the Arabs of the former Ottoman colonies that as a reward for supporting the Allies they could have their independence) is even more flagrant in the case of the independent nation of Palestine than in that of the independent nation of Syria. For in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country...The four powers are committed to Zionism and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long tradition, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desire and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land,'"

No comments: